crime+scene+script

media type="custom" key="4713679" My name is Detective Mateo. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene it took place at a beach house on the patio around noon. The alleged victim was Felix Nevidad. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra. This suspect's guilt was confimed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene. The most incriminating piece of evidence was The note just how she wrote it it is a sad tragedy. The evidence was found next to a paper towel it was writen on card board who writes a note on card board. The test performed was Vera's name on the card board but that were pretty sure that Kendra actually did it. The results of the test were well we actually got to test them and i think we found some fingerprints (Suspects handwriting samples were compared) but now that Kendra is trying to frame Vera and left it at the crime scene on purpose. This connects the suspect to the crime because of Kendra's fingerprints The next piece of evidence collected was the fingerprints found on the cola cups exept this time Kendra did it with a certain drug. The drug was found on the ice cube trey. The test performed was a powder test (ph test). The results of the test was like a white powder that looked like snow (base, neutral, or acid). This connects the suspect to the crime because it said on there resumes that both Kendra and Vera had powder on there shoes. Another piece of evidence collected was the artist brush and the paint on the bowl. It was found in section two of the crime scene. This connects the suspect to the crime because on her resimay it said that she was an artist we think that she was the one who painted all the shoe and dog prints. (Why would she do this and how does it connect ot the crime?) The last piece of evidence collected was the fake blood. It was found next to the blood stain on the paper towel. The test performed was the powder test. The results of the test were just fake stains from. This connects the suspect to the crime because she tried to make alfredo "bleed". According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. it was just so horrible having kendra frame everyone even felix she had lied to us and every thing else you name.( This needed to be a step-by-step explanation of how Kendra committed the crime.) Therefore. kendra goode committed the crime of framing every one so she does not get caught for killing felix for wanting the money. **Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 65% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  || __** The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  **__ || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || **__Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.__**  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || __**The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.**__ || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || __** Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  **__ || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || **__Rehearsed, smooth delivery.__**  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.__**  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.__**  || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__**  || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  __** || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  __** || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 37/57